So let me get this straight….talk about something sexual or excretory, and you get fined. But film a sex video with your significant other, have it get blown out all over the Internet, all while being the daughter of a pretty well to do family, and you become a superstar who companies are marketing with? I’m confused.
If we’re so concerned about portrayal of things, as well as the intrinsic values of words and actions, then what is the difference between A) idolizing an attractive girl who has pretty much made a career out of being a high profile socialite who shows up on Page Six once a week and answers the telephone during sex - and B) using the terms “the f-word” to describe the use of, well, the f-word. And no, I’m not looking for a stretch here.
Today, I caught a press release on BusinessWire from AOL, where they were promoting the latest video by Won-G (whose name only sounds totally like Warren G’s, but that’s just me), where his new video for the song “Caught Up In The Rapture,” is debuting on AOL before it shows up on television early next week. You can see a photo of the aforementioned Ms. Hilton, Won-G, and Gizelle (not sure who she is) at this location.
This goes back to a point I’ve been trying to make for weeks. If our government is so concerned about “protecting” us all from what someone considers “bad” influences out there, why does Ms. Hilton get the free pass? Companies certainly aren’t afraid to utilize her as a spokesperson, actress, or name to put in a press release - because they know people are interested in her (in one way or another). So yet again, all the garbage about “what the people want” is just jive.
[snark]
Now if only someone would report back to me about the vid that Wonkette is talking about with the “Lady Justices” and the John Ashcroft doll, I would feel much better. What - it’s NSFW, people - c’mon!
[/snark]
