if (isset($newskin)) { $newskin=(int)$newskin; if ($newskin<1) $newskin=2; if ($newskin>2) $newskin=2; } elseif (isset($skin)) { $newskin=(int)$skin; if ($skin<1) $newskin=2; if ($skin>2) $newskin=2; } else { $newskin=2; } $skin=$newskin; $headervar = "/home/mediamogul/www/www.themediadrop.com/docs/skins/header"; $footervar = "/home/mediamogul/www/www.themediadrop.com/docs/skins/footer"; $extension = ".php"; ?>


| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This morning, Michelle Malkin recalled the events that transpired Thursday evening on MSNBC's "Hardball" with Chris Matthews. Specifically, she's pointing out how she was brought on to speak on certain topics, including national security, the FBI, and her book - but was told shortly before going on air that this would be changed to the Swift Boat Veterans and then her book. That's all fine, and happens all the time. But this was followed up with a switch of Dana Milbank off the panel - who was confirmed just hours earlier - and then replaced with Willie Brown. Malkin confirms via email that the replacement of Milbank was "At the last minute--literally." Yet again, perhaps something came up with Milbank, though he appeared in the next segment - but this isn't the first example of a guest being asked to come on a show to debate or discuss something in particular, only to have the topic be completely different by the time the show is taped. I'm not going to sit here and say that every talk show host or producer is "out to get" the guests that are booked, but I absolutely disagree that people aren't put into "ambush" situations on purpose on occasion.
Most journalists and some subject matter experts are slick enough to switch topics on a whim, but that doesn't mean this should become the rule, rather than the exception. Was there a super drastic change in the Swift Boat Veterans story that forced the issue to become the official topic of discussion on the show, and have Dana Milbank moved off the panel? I'm not sure that there was, to be honest.
Finally, I think if Matthews is going to hammer Malkin about the "self-inflicted" injury that John Kerry received a Purple Heart for, he's no better than anyone on any other show or if he's not going to let her answer the question in total. And clarify what they're saying. And that includes the panel on any episode of Jerry Springer's show all the way over to Sean Hannity. Something being "self-inflicted" doesn't necessarily mean that they "shot themself" or whatever. She was absolutely stating that in the book people alleged that Kerry's wounds were "self-inflicted." Perhaps if there was a breath in there for someone to not be asked something over and over, and actually have their answer not only heard - but comprehended, our media system wouldn't become a joke.
[update: 5:41pm Eastern] LGF confirms a point made on the Drudge Report that Kerry's campaign has stated that the Senator's first Purple Heart may have been self-inflicted.
I have to disagree with some of your comments. Malkin was not "sandbagged", she put her foot in her own mouth when she said "said some veterans question Kerry getting the Purple Heart for self-inflicted wounds."
The interview was going fine until she said that. Matthews then tried to get her to say answer who was saying that and she kept stammering and finally said, it's in the book. He then asked her several times if she believed that the wounds were self-inflicted. Finally after getting flustered, she said yes.
Matthews "hammered her" as you call it, because she throws out this comment with no regards to whether it was true or not, and then she refused to answer why she was saying that. I applaude Matthews for making her explain herself, rather than just let her get out her Republican party standard line.
Even if the wound was self-inflicted, per the rules regarding Purple Hearts, Kerry would have been still entitled to receive it, if it happened in combat, and it was not due to gross misconduct on his part.
Posted by: Joe D at August 24, 2004 3:00 PMJoe - by "sandbagged" I wasn't talking about Matthews hammering her in the Q&A, I was talking about the consistency in which talk shows "switch up" their shows and guests in a way that leaves some guests at a loss or talking about topics they weren't ready to talk about. They prepare just as much as a host prepares (or doesn't, in some cases). The point here is that Malkin did indeed say that this is what she read in the book - it's not that Kerry doesn't deserve the Purple Heart because, as you stated, it's in combat.
Irrelevant of the "truth" of something, when she answered that this was what the people who wrote the book said. She wasn't giving her opinion over whether he "shot himself," she was pointing out that the Swift Vets were stating that the injury had nothing to do with enemy fire.
Posted by: Tom at August 24, 2004 3:52 PM